All submissions to the CIPCV 2024 will be reviewed:
CIPCV Editors perform an initial review of the manuscript's suitability to ensure the submission falls within the scope of the conference upon receipt. And each manuscript will be checked if it has potential problem of plagiarism. Papers not passing the plagiarism checking or the topic is out of the conference will be rejected immediately.
Only the papers passed the initial check will be double-blind peer-reviewed by 2 or 3 independent reviewers. Reviewers evaluate submissions based on the requirements of the conference proceedings, predefined criteria, and quality, completeness, originality and grammar of the research presented.
Authors are required to respond to the peer review comments in details and make minor or major revisions according to the points raised. The revised paper will be evaluated again. Usually, one round of major revisions is allowed. Acceptance is granted when reviewers' recommendations are positive.
CIPCV is utterly intolerant of plagiarism. Submitted papers are expected to contain original work executed by the authors with adequate, proper and scholarly citations to the work of others. It is the job of the authors to clearly identify both their own contribution(s) and also published results / techniques on which they depend or build. Reviewers are charged to ensure these standards are met.
If the author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following acts of sanction will be taken:
1. Reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications.
2. Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s)
3. Report the authors violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research funding agency.
4. Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the plagiarist”.